Introduction to Project
ETI company members are increasingly aware of the presence of homeworkers
in their supply chains. These are workers carrying out paid work from home,
producing products or services, and often paid according to the quantity
produced rather than hours worked. Homeworkers may face very poor working
conditions as they are rarely protected by national labour law, formal
employment status or union membership, and they can be isolated and invisible.
This project was set up to provide guidance to members on how to tackle
these challenges.
Work initially began by exploring the conditions of homeworkers making
Christmas crackers in the UK, a case study which made some progress in generating
learning on how to implement the ETI Base Code. However, following a significant
reduction in the number of UK homeworkers making crackers, the case study
closed in July 2004. A full report of that case study is publicly available
and found below in the list of project documents, entitled
‘Report of ETI Christmas crackers work’.
The project has now moved to focus on homeworkers in the fabric embellishment
industry in Northern India, where a highly active tri-partite sub-group
has been working throughout 2005 in partnership with the UK group on developing
guidelines to applying and implementing the ETI Base Code with
Homeworkers. The first draft of these guidelines should be complete by April
2006. The recommendations for retailers and suppliers will then be tested
by UK project group member companies, while the Delhi sub-group will seek
to establish a ‘multi-stakeholder action agency’, ideally including
government officials, contractors and homeworkers themselves, that will
implement key parts of the guidelines requiring co-operation across the
supply chain. This last element of the project falls within our capacity
building programme and represents an exciting and unprecedented step forward
in the labour rights field.
Project aims and objectives
The project aims and objectives are to:
- establish how the ETI Base Code can be applied, implemented
and monitored with homeworkers
- learn about different approaches to tackling poor working conditions
of homeworkers in supply chains
- increase members’ and others understanding of the situation of
homeworkers
- improve the working conditions of homeworkers.
Key achievements and challenges:
- Lessons learned from Christmas crackers case study:
The closure of this area of the project’s work was very disappointing
for all involved – ETI Homeworker Group members, suppliers
and homeworkers themselves. However, communication with suppliers and
consultation with homeworkers have yielded practical lessons on how the
ETI Base Code works in the homeworker context. We now have
greater clarity on issues such as employment status, holiday pay and piece
rates which apply to all UK homeworkers. Furthermore, lessons learned
are being incorporated into the draft Guidelines on implementing the ETI
Base Code with Homeworkers as well as being used in our north Indian case
study.
- Change in UK legislation:
The UK government decided in July 2004 to alter the piece rate system
established under UK National Minimum Wage legislation (NMW).
From April 2005, each worker will either have to be paid per hour worked
at the NMW, or be paid a piece
rate at 120%. Many stakeholders, including the ETI Homeworker
Group, had lobbied the UK government to implement these changes which
should have a beneficial effect on homeworkers’ pay.
- Collaborative working and awareness raising:
The project has helped to raise awareness about homeworkers, their rights
and the issues they face. It also clearly indicated the need for greater
involvement of trade unions and the sharing of experience between trade
unions and NGOs in
order to protect informal economy workers. Group members participated
in a fringe meeting on the issue at the Trades Union Congress (TUC)
in September 2003. It also supported the launch of a campaign on homeworkers
between three of our members, Oxfam, the TUC
and the National Group on Homeworking in May 2004. Group members have
also raised homework issues at an international labour standards conference
presentation in November 2003 and at the International Textile Garment
and Leather Workers’ Federation conference in October 2004.
- Significant project progress in India:
A local Co-ordinator, Vinita Singh, was recruited in April 2004. A successful
awareness-raising seminar was conducted with Homeworker Group company
members’ suppliers in May 2004, attended by over 60 people. This
led to the involvement of 13 suppliers, their sub-contractors and homeworkers
as well as various other stakeholders in a piece of research conducted
in summer 2004. The research explored the concerns and priorities of homeworkers
as well as their current working and living environment. It also assessed
current knowledge, attitudes and practices for homeworkers, employers
and influencers with regard to the ETI Base Code, in order
to indicate possible future actions. Seminars to feedback and consult
on the research were held with suppliers, sub-contractors, unions and
NGOs in Delhi in October 2004. A group of members’
local staff representatives, trade union affiliates and NGO
partners of the UK project group has been established and meets regularly
in Delhi.
- Throughout 2005, the Delhi local group has been working in partnership
with the UK group on developing guidelines to applying and implementing
the ETI Base Code with Homeworkers. Throughout the first
quarter of 2006, consultations will be held in India with local stakeholders
including: exporters, contractors, sub-contractors and crucially, homeworkers
themselves, on the draft guidelines. These consultations will inform the
final version of the first draft, which we aim to have complete by April
2006.
Plans
- From April 2006, the recommendations for retailers and suppliers
will be tested by UK project group member companies. Concurrently, the Delhi
group will seek to establish a ‘multi-stakeholder action agency’,
ideally to include government officials, contractors and homeworkers themselves,
that will implement key parts of the guidelines that require co-operation
across the supply chain. This element of the project falls within our capacity
building programme and represents an exciting and unprecedented step
forward in the labour rights field.
Which ETI members are involved?
Companies:
Boots, Gap Inc, Marks & Spencer, Madison Hosiery, Monsoon/Accessorize,
Next, Pentland, Sainsbury’s, The Body Shop International, WH Smith.
Trade unions:
National Union of Knitwear, Footwear and Apparel Trades, Trades Union Congress.
NGOs:
Homeworkers WorldWide, National Group on Homeworking, Oxfam GB,
Traidcraft
As well as some of their suppliers, affiliates and partners in the UK and
in India.
For further information contact:
Liz Kirk, Head of Projects, liz@eti.org.uk


Project documents:
- ETI Homeworker
guidelines: recommendations for working with homeworkers (July 2006)
- UK Crackers - downloads:
- Roundtable report,
July 2002
Other relevant links
Reports on the
ETI impact assessment, 2006: Part
2a: Findings and recommendations from a case study in India (garments)
Report on the ETI
Biennial Conference 2003:
Chapter 5 - Linking
wages, overtime and productivity
Chapter 6 - The
challenge of code implementation in supply chains that include homeworkers
and/or smallholders
Homeworkers Worldwide – www.homeworkersww.org.uk
National Group on Homeworking (UK) – www.homeworking.gn.apc.org