Key challenges in ethical trade: Report on the ETI Biennial Conference 2003
Chapter 5
Linking wages, overtime and productivity
There is growing recognition that wages, working hours and productivity are all interlinked, and that the issues usually need to be addressed together. This workshop aimed to improve understanding of these links and to explore options for improving wages, reducing excessive overtime and improving productivity. The experiences of the Impactt Overtime Project in China, the Dewhirst Group (UK) [1], Prem Durai Exports (India) and the Free Trade Zone and General Services Union (Sri Lanka) provided practical examples of how to tackle the issues.
5.1 Background
If they are paid very low wages, many workers work excessive overtime in order to make ends meet. Efforts to reduce overtime without tackling poor wages can therefore be problematic. Improving wages and cutting excessive overtime can both lead to improved productivity, by improving workers' motivation and work efficiency. If handled effectively, this can be a strong incentive for managers to address both issues. Conversely, looking into the underlying causes of excessive overtime often reveals that low productivity (resulting from poor management systems and practices) is a root cause of excessive overtime.
Recognising this, some sourcing companies are working with their suppliers to improve management skills and efficiency at the factory level. Experience indicates that productivity gains can be substantial and shows the potential for win-win strategies in certain circumstances. With improved productivity rates, the need/demand for overtime is reduced, and suppliers – at least theoretically – are given the financial leeway to improve wage rates.
5.2 What is a 'living wage'?
A 'living wage' is a simple concept, but in practice poses a number of challenges. A living wage may be defined as a wage level that allows the worker, within a standard working week (that is without having to work excessive overtime), to meet their basic needs and those of their dependent family members, and allow for some discretionary income. In practice, companies have found it difficult to identify what constitutes a living wage. It is not too difficult to find out whether workers at a particular workplace are earning a living wage, but development of a universal formula for calculating a living wage in different situations has proved problematic. This is because what workers consider as 'basic needs' vary significantly from country to country, and between groups within a country. In most developing countries, a 'family' is also a difficult unit to define – a worker's number of 'dependent relatives' may well increase if their income increases.
Studies on the issue indicate that many workers in global supply chains are earning significantly less than a living wage. Moreover, many workers, including piece-rate workers working to unrealistic production targets, earn less than the legal minimum wage. The studies also show that, in many developing countries, the legal minimum wage is considerably lower than a living wage. Therefore, even workers who earn the legal minimum wage may find it is insufficient to meet basic needs, and cope by working excessive overtime, taking on more than one job, sending their children to work, and/or borrowing money.
In countries where the legal minimum wage is significantly below a living wage, some suppliers may genuinely find it difficult to pay a living wage. Often operating in unstable economic and political conditions at the national level, and under constant price pressure from their customers, profit margins can be small and provide little leeway for a substantial increase in wages.
5.3 The causes and costs of excessive overtime
Poor production planning, inefficient work methods, lack of skilled operators, lack of training opportunities and limited management capacity within the factory can all contribute to demand for excessive overtime. External pressures such as short lead times, 'just in time' ordering patterns, late confirmation of orders, changing quality requirements, penalties for late deliveries and other purchasing practices of customers, in conjunction with flawed or late delivery of raw materials, make it difficult to predict, plan and keep to production schedules. Balancing these disparate pressures, factories can often find it difficult, if not impossible, to ensure production targets are met without demanding overtime, often at very short notice.
As noted above, insufficient wages or piece rates and unrealistic production targets also push many workers into working long hours on a 'voluntary' basis. The possible repercussions of excessive overtime include a tired and frustrated workforce, high worker turnover resulting in a lower skilled workforce, increased health and safety problems, reduced productivity, reduced production quality, increased wastage of material, and over-utilisation of machines resulting in increased maintenance problems.
5.4 Curtailing overtime and improving wages and productivity: companies' experiences
5.4.1 Prem Durai Exports, India
One client company of the Prem Group has been implementing a quality management standard (ISO 9000), an environmental management standard (ISO 14000) and SA 8000 management systems. Implementation of these standards had led to substantial improvements in the company's management systems and practices. This has allowed the company to reduce overtime work and pay a living wage, while also making many operational improvements.
Specific changes which helped to reduce overtime included:
- improved production forecasting and planning
- improving productivity through adoption of a line production system and a range of other measures
- improving interdepartmental co-operation
- improving grievance handling mechanisms
- introducing measures to reduce absenteeism.
The improved management practices led to a range of benefits for workers and management. These are summarised in the table below.