Skip to main content
Home

User Menu

  • Perspective
  • Log in

Main menu

  • Home
  • About ETI
    • Our members
      • Previous members
    • What we do
      • Resolving violations
    • Why we exist
      • ETI's origins
    • Our impact on workers
    • Accountability
    • Funding
    • Our strategy
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members
    • Contact
  • ETI Base Code
    • 1. Employment is freely chosen
    • 2. Freedom of association
    • 3. Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • 4. Child labour shall not be used
    • 5. Living wages are paid
    • 6. Working hours are not excessive
    • 7. No discrimination is practiced
    • 8. Regular employment is provided
    • 9. No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Programmes
  • Join ETI
    • How to apply
    • What members sign up to
    • The business case
  • Training
    • All courses
    • Essentials of ethical trade series
    • Human rights due diligence series
    • China series
    • ETI trainers
    • Bespoke training
  • Resources
    • Case studies
    • Newsletters
    • Useful links
  • Issues
    • Union rights at work
    • COVID-19
    • Modern slavery
      • Modern slavery and transparency standards
      • Modern slavery initiatives
      • Modern slavery resources
      • Modern slavery evaluation framework
    • Due diligence
      • ETI’s work on human rights due diligence
        • ETI’s work in Pakistan
        • Pakistan, labour rights resources
      • Resources on human rights due diligence
    • Public procurement & responsible business
    • Company purchasing practices
      • Working conditions in the Leicester garment industry
    • Grievance mechanisms & remedy
    • Gender equity
      • Gender equality - initiatives
      • Gender equality - international standards
      • Gender equality - resources
    • A living wage for workers
      • Living wage initiatives
      • Living wage resources
      • Living wage standards
      • Wages and purchasing theories
    • Business and human rights in India
    • Child labour
    • Homeworkers
    • Migrant workers
    • HIV at work
    • Ethical trade and fairtrade
  • Blog
  • Events
    • Ethical Insights series

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. blog

Elizabeth Warren’s Accountable Capitalism Act – will it benefit workers in the supply chain?

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Martin Buttle
  • 22 August 2018

In the wake of the proposed Accountable Capitalism Act in the US, ETI's Martin Buttle reflects on what responsible business should look like and how business models can impact on workers in global supply chains. 

Last week, Elizabeth Warren, the Massachusetts Senator who is expected to run as a Democratic presidential candidate in 2020, introduced a bill dubbed the Accountable Capitalism Act, which aims to redistribute wealth and ensure American corporations consider wider stakeholders in their decision-making.

Under the proposed Act, US corporates of over 1billion US$ turnover would need to apply for a federal corporate charter, which would require corporate directors to consider the interests of all major corporate stakeholders – not just shareholders – in company decisions.

The bill also gives workers a stronger voice in corporate decision-making. Employees could elect at least 40% of directors, which would make corporate directors more accountable to the workers in their businesses. Of course, this isn’t a new idea. It’s already a feature of German corporate governance, where a third of the supervisory board of large companies must be elected. Similar ideas have been floated here in the UK. But it is a bold proposition given the political climate in the US.

Who benefits from business?

Warren has argued that under the 30-year-old ‘shareholder value maximisation’ ideology, shareholders have been the main beneficiary of corporate wealth creation to the detriment of workers and communities.

She points out that since this ideology became dominant, the link between wage growth and productivity has been broken. Overall wages have stagnated whilst American corporates have enjoyed huge profits.

For example, CEO pay in both the UK and the US has far outstripped workers’ pay. In the US, the average CEO of a big company now makes 361 times what the average worker makes, up from 42 times in 1980.

As my colleague, Ben Rutledge, has pointed out, the proposed legislation is not anti-capitalist (although it will surely be painted this way) but about more responsible capitalism that benefits workers as well as shareholders.

Human rights due diligence 

In the 20 years since ETI’s creation, the idea that companies should be responsible for the human rights of workers in their supply chains has moved from being a marginal concern to a central area of international policy making, with organisations like the ILO proposing a roadmap to Decent work in Global Supply Chains and the OECD developing policies and guidance on Business and Human Rights Due Diligence.

Broadly speaking, the Act can be thought of as legislation that fits with the thrust of human rights due diligence policy, although it only focuses on US corporate workers and not the workers who labour in their supply chains, which is perhaps a missed opportunity.

Purchasing and business models

ETI has long had a focus on responsible purchasing - the notion that buyers should consider the impact of their decision-making processes on suppliers and workers in the supply chain. However, this year we have started to look at the bigger picture on business models.

We are living in an era of unprecedented change, which is putting many business models under stress. Changes in consumer buying habits, technology and automation, the rise of social media and expectations around transparency are putting industries under more scrutiny than ever.

Many stakeholders point to the prevailing model in the apparel and textile sector, which has shifted sourcing to low cost/low wage countries. Brands/retailers have the power to dictate prices and production runs, as well as specification and quality, and tend to pass competitive pressure from customers on down the supply chain without much consideration for the impact of their buying practices on suppliers.

Too often this has resulted in poorly capitalised manufacturers; poor quality factories using production technology that has not evolved in decades; long working hours at low wages, illegal sub-contracting and externalised costs.

That’s why ETI has commissioned Kings College Business School to undertake a study of the evidence linking business models to the ability of companies to support or undermine labour standards in their supply chains.

We’ll be hosting a discussion on this topic at our 20th Anniversary conference at the end of October.

Drawing the strands together

There is a need to experiment with business models and to create new approaches that lead to more socially responsible and equitable outcomes, and legislation like the Accountable Capitalism Act could help support this.

Warren herself references B Corps, which give businesses fiduciary responsibilities beyond their shareholders. As she notes, successful companies such as Patagonia and Kickstarter have already embraced this model.

In much of our work, responsible companies complain that it’s not a level playing field, and that irresponsible companies can derive short-term benefits from not supporting better labour standards or acting in ways that undermine collective efforts. This is where strong regulation backed by government can support and encourage responsible business.

We’ll be watching developments in the US closely. It will be tough for the bill to survive given the current political environment, but if it does, I hope it won’t just be workers in America who benefit. 

ETI's blog covers issues at the intersection of business, news and ethical trade. We welcome a range of insights and opinions from our guest bloggers, though don't necessarily agree with everything they say.

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Blog RSS

Related content

  • How can tea buyers and retailers support workers in Assam?
  • Guest vlog: Oxfam's Rosa Polaschek on how supermarkets can mitigate the impact of Covid-19 on supply chain workers, especially women
  • The Better Buying good purchasing practice guidelines at a glance
  • Public procurement and responsible business
  • Bangladesh: Partnership to promote responsible buying in the garment sector
  • ETI Corporate Members Roundtable 22/11/19

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on ethical trade.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Footer

  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Privacy
  • Modern slavery statement
Other ETIs: Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127