Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful Stakeholder Engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equality in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
    • Annual impact report
  • About ETI
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. blog

Death of a worker

  • Stirling Smith
  • 4 July 2014

­­­I arrived in Bangladesh, checked into my hotel, and asked for a newspaper. There on the back page was a story, just a few column ­­­inches in length, which shines a light on everything we do for ethical trade.

Workers at a factory which had been closed over a wages dispute “beat up and hacked to death” another worker, because they thought he was “a management spy”. We only have one name of the victim, Swapan.

Violence of this type never seems far below the surface here. Managers can be attacked, factories vandalised, cars set on fire when workers “go on the rampage” as it is termed. Managers told me that “we go into hiding when these things happen.”

In neighbouring India too, such incidents are becoming more frequent. Last month I was in Assam, and was told of an incident where some workers on a tea estate set fire to a manager’s bungalow, killing him and all his family.

Now some might say, agreeing with Paolo Freire (not a Brazilian footballer, but very influential in leftist circles back in the 1970s) that the “violence of the oppressed” is different from the “violence of the oppressors”. That a few dead managers are nothing compared to, say, the numbers killed at Rana Plaza. I doubt many readers will buy that.

Or you might say, looking at the rest of the paper that day, “there seems to be an awful lot of violence in this society.” True, there were some other ghastly stories.

Those who know some history might point out that two hundred years ago, groups of workers such as the Luddites in the UK used violence and assassinated at least one factory owner - an incident that was fictionalised in Charlotte Bronte’s second novel Shirley. These things will just happen in the early stages of industrialisation, they will say.

Well yes, maybe. Historians should take a long view, but do we have to go on repeating the mistakes of two centuries ago?

What drives people to murder one of their co-workers? What seething resentment boils over and targets a suspected management chamcha? (A word which literally means a spoon).

It’s not poverty. Garment workers are by no means the poorest of the poor in Bangladesh, where 17% of the population are destitute, according to new research. That’s better than India where the figure is 28.5%. Destitute means you might have lost two of your children to a common, treatable illness, that you have to defecate in the open, you don’t have electricity, you don’t have a mobile phone, the floor where you live is mud, the walls plastic or tin. You have no assets.

Life is hard for garment workers in Bangladesh, but they are not destitute. In fact, they have expectations, hopes and dreams. They have learned that they have rights.

And they are getting impatient. Workers know that the sweat of their brow has meant huge wealth coming into Bangladesh and they want a share. They also want to be treated with some dignity.

Bangladesh’s garments workers have also seen that when they “go on the rampage” they do get the attention, even if momentarily, of the country’s truly awful elite. Which might just get a result, like an increase in the minimum wage.

The dispute that sparked Swapan’s murder was over some unpaid wages and piece rates. Once workers might have just accepted whatever management offered. But they can read the papers; they know that the world is watching Bangladesh’s garment industry and that there are supposed to be changes.

And their anger is because they don’t see the changes - yet.

So we need to deliver. We are in danger of forgetting that ethical trade is not about reputation management, or “building robust supply chains systems” or whatever.

It’s about making workers' lives better. And in doing that, we might stop another tragedy like Swapan’s death.

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Blog RSS

Related content

  • Where are the women?
  • Joint recommendations for responsible business conduct in Bangladesh
  • Request for Proposals: Landscape Mapping and Situational Analysis of Grievance Mechanisms in the Indian Garment Sector
  • OHS training to RMG factory managers & supervisors
  • ETI support to RMG factory safety committees in Bangladesh
  • Developing a pool of master trainers

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on ethical trade.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127