Skip to main content
Home

User Menu

  • Perspective
  • Log in

Main menu

  • Home
  • About ETI
    • Our members
      • Previous members
    • What we do
      • Resolving violations
    • Why we exist
      • ETI's origins
    • Our impact on workers
    • Accountability
    • Funding
    • Our strategy
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members
    • Contact
  • ETI Base Code
    • 1. Employment is freely chosen
    • 2. Freedom of association
    • 3. Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • 4. Child labour shall not be used
    • 5. Living wages are paid
    • 6. Working hours are not excessive
    • 7. No discrimination is practiced
    • 8. Regular employment is provided
    • 9. No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Programmes
  • Join ETI
    • How to apply
    • What members sign up to
    • The business case
  • Training
    • All courses
    • Essentials of ethical trade series
    • Human rights due diligence series
    • China series
    • ETI trainers
    • Bespoke training
  • Resources
    • Case studies
    • Newsletters
    • Useful links
  • Issues
    • Union rights at work
    • COVID-19
    • Modern slavery
      • Modern slavery and transparency standards
      • Modern slavery initiatives
      • Modern slavery resources
      • Modern slavery evaluation framework
    • Due diligence
      • ETI’s work on human rights due diligence
        • ETI’s work in Pakistan
        • Pakistan, labour rights resources
      • Resources on human rights due diligence
    • Public procurement & responsible business
    • Company purchasing practices
      • Working conditions in the Leicester garment industry
    • Grievance mechanisms & remedy
    • Gender equity
      • Gender equality - initiatives
      • Gender equality - international standards
      • Gender equality - resources
    • A living wage for workers
      • Living wage initiatives
      • Living wage resources
      • Living wage standards
      • Wages and purchasing theories
    • Business and human rights in India
    • Child labour
    • Homeworkers
    • Migrant workers
    • HIV at work
    • Ethical trade and fairtrade
  • Blog
  • Events
    • Ethical Insights series

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Blog

Marks and Spencer shares independent Oxfam report into its food and footwear supply chain

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Lindsay Wright
  • 15 January 2021
M&S logo

Oxfam has published a report on Marks and Spencer’s food and footwear supply chain, after being asked by the brand to act as a "critical friend" and conduct a gap analysis of its supply chain.

Carmel McQuaid, Mark's and Spencer's Head of Sustainable Business, has also written a blog to highlight the report, and discuss its findings.

M&S's objective was to pinpoint the areas  it need to address in its own operations and those of our suppliers to ensure workers have a voice, but also to identify actions required to bring about sector-wide change in what is an increasingly interdependent and globalised supply chain.  

The research has identified some examples of good practice, while also raising a number of issues common to the the global food industry, including in-work poverty, long term damage to health, inadequate sick pay, discrimination and poor worker representation. 

A key conclusion from the report is that there is a disconnect between the information that M&S managers receive about conditions in workplaces, based largely on third party ethical audits, and what workers report as their experience. 

The report makes a list of recommendations from Oxfam and a response from M&S and a list of actions following the findings.

Marks and Spencer is sharing the report, alongside the framework of its worker voice programme and the learning from work with the wider industry aimed at driving meaningful change at scale for workers in global supply chains.

Peter McAllister, ETI's Executive Director, comments: 

"This is a very important initiative and shows M&S in its leadership position. While audits may have their place, they also have their limitations, so having a credible and informed partner like Oxfam review conditions is very valuable not only to Marks and Spender but also to the wider sector."

Comments

ETI's blog covers issues at the intersection of business, news and ethical trade. We welcome a range of insights and opinions from our guest bloggers, though don't necessarily agree with everything they say.

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Blog RSS

Related content

  • Human rights due diligence: 2-day immersive training
  • Public procurement and responsible business
  • Businesses need to act now on human rights or face the consequences later – and the OECD has set the standard
  • Protect, Respect and Remedy: what does Ruggie's framework mean for ethical trade?
  • Human rights due diligence in Malaysia's manufacturing sector
  • Ergon: Human Rights Due Diligence

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on ethical trade.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Footer

  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Privacy
  • Modern slavery statement
Other ETIs: Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127