Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • About ETI
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members
    • Our Strategy
  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful stakeholder engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equity in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
      • RPP in manufacturing
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
      • Blog series: Extreme heat and risks to workers
      • Blog series: Tackling gender-based violence through GRACE
    • Issues
      • Human rights due diligence (HRDD): a complete guide for business
        • What is human rights due diligence?
        • Human rights due diligence legislation and regulatory requirements
        • How to implement human rights due diligence in your company
        • HRDD risk assessment for supply chains
        • Supplier engagement and human rights due diligence
      • Forced labour & modern slavery: a complete guide for business
        • What is modern slavery? Definitions, forms and scale
        • How to identify forced labour in your supply chain
        • Remediation: what to do when forced labour is found
        • Modern slavery legislation: what businesses need to know
        • EU Forced Labour Regulation: what it means for your business
        • How to write a modern slavery statement
        • High-risk sectors and sourcing regions for forced labour
        • Forced labour and migrant workers in supply chains
      • Responsible purchasing practices: what they are and why they matter
        • How to implement responsible purchasing practices
        • Responsible purchasing practices and legislation: what companies need to know
        • Responsible purchasing practices by sector
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
      • ETI Insights series
    • Impact report 2024-25

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. blog

ETI responds to publication of Alison Levitt QC's boohoo enquiry report

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Lindsay Wright - ETI
  • 25 September 2020

We did not respond to this enquiry, as we had concerns that it wasn't sufficiently rigorous, and was asking limited questions. 

The problems in Leicester have existed, and been common knowledge, for more than a decade. Alison Levitt seems at pains to emphasise that boohoo management took positive action from 2019 to address these issues, but she does not comment upon their operations in previous years when orders were increasing and profits were rolling in whilst media and auditors reported continued problems.

Can we really trust all elements of this enquiry, when boohoo refused to grant access to Board emails? The assertion in the Executive Summary that no evidence of criminal activity was uncovered conflicts with the reports made of a meeting on 16 December 2019 at boohoo's offices, mentioned on page 86 of the full report, at which Leon Reed, Verisio's Managing Director, told boohoo that he had identified "criminal activity and ridiculously poor conditions." 

We have found no mention of the valuable role of trade unions in preventing the exploitation of workers, and while the recommendation for greater supply chain transparency is welcome, boohoo's  continuing refusal to engage in any kind of dialogue with trade unions, despite repeated approaches, is disappointing.

It’s easy to blame suppliers in these situations, but the behaviours of factory managers are often shaped by the business practices of the brand. Whilst blame is passed around, the workers continue to suffer. Now we hear that sourcing operations are being moved out of this Leicester spotlight, to Morocco or Turkey where there may be less attention. So instead of improving conditions for workers who have already sacrificed so much, they simply lose their jobs altogether.  

ETI, is working with the Apparel & General Merchandise Public/Private Partnership, bringing together many stakeholders involved in the UK Garment Industry including brands, trade unions, community groups, local politicians and enforcement bodies to try to bring about meaningful change in Leicester. We hope boohoo will recognise the significance of its presence in this area and play a leading role in bringing about positive change for workers in Leicester.

ETI's blog covers issues at the intersection of business and human rights. We feature posts by, for and from our members and allies; we do not accept or offer payment for posts or publish content outside of these criteria. We welcome a range of insights and opinions from our guest bloggers, though don't necessarily agree with everything they say.

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Blog RSS

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on responsible business.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127