Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful Stakeholder Engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equality in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
    • Annual impact report
  • About ETI
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. blog

Greenpeace's latest report on the tuna industry leaves Nick Kightley with a sense of deja vu ...

  • Nick Kightley
  • 2 September 2020

Another sad report into effective due diligence, sad for people, the future of tuna stocks and our future.

The new Greenpeace report on the top 20 tuna canning companies in South East Asia reports that out of the 20, only 4 demonstrate significant levels of responsibility.

There are 7 recommendations to companies buying tuna from this region.

These recommendations are all good to see.

But, sadly, they in general are having to repeat earlier due diligence recommendations made and still not well followed by international buyers.

There is a sense of déjà vu here. Aren’t we going in rather ineffective circles that do not challenge the fundamental flaws of our global fishing industry:

  • harmful and unsustainable fishing practices
  • IUU fishing and criminal exploitation of fishing crews
  • industry/business models that prioritise short-term profit over a viable future and vested interests of individual States over global society needs?

How else might our global fisheries industry be run?

Greenpeace also proposes a division of the oceans to create zones for fish to safely breed and recover - across a third of the entire ocean.

Again, this is an excellent proposal. But where is the political will and leadership to take these responsible decisions?

Sadly, there is no consensus in sight and no unifying of society to demand that sustainability must come first – for fishers, for fish stocks, for a safe industry to be a part of and for us all as consumers.

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Blog RSS

Related content

  • Common Framework for Responsible Purchasing Practices in Food
  • Business continuity guide
  • Covid-19 awareness & prevention webinar for Africa agri-business sites
  • Migrant worker exploitation in UK agriculture: ETI statement
  • Exploitation of migrant labour in the UK Seasonal Agriculture Workers’ Scheme
  • COVID Winter Response Guidance for Food, Horticulture and Agriculture

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on ethical trade.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127