Skip to main content
Home

User Menu

  • Log in

Main menu

  • Home
  • About ETI
    • Our members
    • What we do
    • Why we exist
      • ETI's origins
    • Our impact for workers
    • Accountability
    • Funding
    • Our strategy
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members
    • Contact
  • ETI Base Code
    • 1. Employment is freely chosen
    • 2. Freedom of association
    • 3. Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • 4. Child labour shall not be used
    • 5. Living wages are paid
    • 6. Working hours are not excessive
    • 7. No discrimination is practiced
    • 8. Regular employment is provided
    • 9. No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Programmes
  • Join ETI
  • Training
    • All courses
    • Essentials of ethical trade series
    • E-Learning Module: Access to Remedy Principles
    • Bespoke training
  • Resources
    • Case studies
    • Useful links
  • Issues
    • Gender equity
      • Violence and harrassment
      • Gender data initiative
      • Gender equality - international standards
      • Gender equality - resources
    • Homeworkers
    • COVID-19
    • Grievance mechanisms & remedy
    • Union rights at work
    • Due diligence
      • ETI’s work on human rights due diligence
        • ETI’s work in Pakistan
        • Pakistan, labour rights resources
      • Resources on human rights due diligence
    • Company purchasing practices
      • Working conditions in the Leicester garment industry
    • A living wage for workers
      • Living wage initiatives
      • Living wage resources
      • Living wage standards
      • Wages and purchasing theories
    • Modern slavery
      • Modern slavery and transparency standards
      • Modern slavery initiatives
      • Modern slavery resources
      • Modern slavery evaluation framework
    • Public procurement & responsible business
    • Migrant workers
    • Business and human rights in India
    • Child labour
    • HIV at work
    • Ethical trade and fairtrade
  • Blog
  • Events

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. blog

Study gives insight into company responses to modern slavery

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • 17 October 2015
Migrant worker

71 per cent of companies believe there is a likelihood of modern slavery occurring at some point within their supply chains, according to a new study launched today. 

The research was a joint initiative by the Ashridge Centre for Business and Sustainability at Hult International Business School and the Ethical Trading Initiative to get a snapshot of company perceptions and current responses to modern slavery at a time that the new UK Modern Slavery Act comes into effect. It interviewed a cross-section of businesses from clothing, groceries, department stores, beverage, home and garden, fresh produce and health and personal care sectors. 

Cindy Berman, ETI Head of Knowledge and Learning and report co-author, said: “We’ve been working with companies on the ethical trade agenda for more than 15 years. We know that many workers are exploited – particularly migrant and vulnerable workers at the lower tiers of supply chains. But the research has revealed that some companies are becoming more honest about the risks of forced labour and are increasingly taking responsibility to address it.” 

Brands and retailers are still mainly concerned with risks to their reputations if modern slavery is found, but recognise that the real risks are to the human rights of workers. And they realise that they need to take a different approach to managing risk. 

Quintin Lake, report co-author and research fellow at Ashridge, said: “All of those we spoke to have publicly committed to ethical trade and are taking active steps to improve working conditions in their supply chains. However, they all agreed that the challenge of modern slavery requires distinct policies, activities and approaches. For example, many have realised that social audits are simply not revealing the hidden nature of modern slavery and they are working on better ways of finding out what is really going on in their supply chains.” 

Companies are realising they need to be more innovative and to collaborate with others because they cannot tackle these problems alone, but competitive tensions can be a barrier. They highlight that building trust and working in partnership with suppliers is far more effective than compliance-driven approaches. 

One important finding of the study is that addressing modern slavery is a leadership issue. Where boards and chief executives are demonstrating active engagement with this issue, those companies are much further ahead in their efforts to tackle it than those where this leadership is not evident. 

Cindy Berman said: “This confirms what we know from ETI’s experience of working with companies. Board and senior-level buy-in makes all the difference in ethical trade because it drives better policies and ways of operating. These companies also tend to be more commercially successful because they have more visibility, oversight and control over their operations.” 

Companies should expect their staff, suppliers and all their stakeholders to be vigilant and to take swift action where violations to workers’ rights are found. But they need to ensure it’s the right action and that they have the necessary skills and expertise. 

Quintin Lake concluded: “All the companies we interviewed highlighted the need for urgent and decisive action, while recognising that the complex nature of modern slavery means solutions will not be quick. No one company can solve it on their own. The advice from those more established is that a concerted effort and strategic partnerships are required.” 

Download the full report here

Supporting comment from TUC General Secretary Frances O'Grady

"Slavery can stain the supply chains of any major company unless action is taken. I welcome the ETI's work with progressive brands and retailers, as well as trade unions and NGOs, to highlight the problem and suggest solutions.

"Companies cannot rely on flawed audits to expose or prevent slavery. Where workers are able to join trade unions, slavery is less likely: unions give workers the power and the freedom to speak out such practices.

"The Government should build on the Modern Slavery Act and ratify the ILO Forced Labour Protocol immediately."

 

ETI's blog covers issues at the intersection of business and human rights. We feature posts by, for and from our members and allies; we do not accept or offer payment for posts or publish content outside of these criteria. We welcome a range of insights and opinions from our guest bloggers, though don't necessarily agree with everything they say.

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Blog RSS

Related content

  • ETI position statement on modern slavery
  • ETI welcomes the OHCHR assessment of human rights concerns in Xinjiang, China
  • ETI Statement: Call to action on human rights abuses in the Uyghur Region in the apparel and textiles sector
  • Uyghur workers in global supply chains: ETI position statement 
  • Myanmar enhanced due diligence sectoral assessment
  • Migrant worker exploitation in UK agriculture: ETI statement

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on ethical trade.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Privacy
  • Modern slavery statement
Other ETIs: Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127