Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • About ETI
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members
    • Our Strategy
  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful stakeholder engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equity in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
      • RPP in manufacturing
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
      • Blog series: Tackling gender-based violence through GRACE
    • Issues
      • Human rights due diligence (HRDD): a complete guide for business
        • What is human rights due diligence?
        • Human rights due diligence legislation and regulatory requirements
        • How to implement human rights due diligence in your company
        • HRDD risk assessment for supply chains
        • Supplier engagement and human rights due diligence
      • Forced labour & modern slavery: a complete guide for business
        • What is modern slavery? Definitions, forms and scale
        • How to identify forced labour in your supply chain
        • Remediation: what to do when forced labour is found
        • Modern slavery legislation: what businesses need to know
        • EU Forced Labour Regulation: what it means for your business
        • How to write a modern slavery statement
        • High-risk sectors and sourcing regions for forced labour
        • Forced labour and migrant workers in supply chains
      • Responsible purchasing practices: what they are and why they matter
        • How to implement responsible purchasing practices
        • Responsible purchasing practices and legislation: what companies need to know
        • Responsible purchasing practices by sector
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
      • ETI Insights series
    • Impact report 2024-25

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. blog

10 year anniversary of Morecambe Bay tragedy

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Owen Tudor - ITUC
  • 6 February 2014
Morecambe Bay, where 23 Chinese workers died, in 2004

Ten years ago last night, 23 Chinese workers lost their lives harvesting cockles in Morecambe Bay. In a concrete memorial to their deaths, the Gangmasters Licensing Authority (GLA) was created to ensure some of Britain's most vulnerable workers were protected and treated with respect. The GLA addresses the British end of supply chains that reach right into our high streets and supermarkets.

If that sounds a bit like the mission statement of ETI, it's no accident. ETI should take enormous pride in the role it played, bringing together unions, decent employers and campaigners to develop a solution and lobby the Government to put it into practice.

Morecambe Bay was a reminder that supply chains aren't all global, and that mistreatment of workers isn't always abroad, although the fact that the cockle pickers were Chinese migrant workers demonstrates how often migration is used to lower terms and conditions in a way that serves neither the exploited migrant workers nor the undercut existing workforce.

Sadly, the current Government seems committed to forgetting the lessons of Morecambe Bay by whittling back the GLA's inspections and reducing the scope of its operations. This ignores the positive role the GLA has played, raising employment standards; reducing tax evasion; and creating a level playing field for business by ensuring that reputable firms are not undercut by rogue operators. Since 2010 alone it has offered protection to over 5,000 workers and recovered around £4 million for victims.

The TUC and our unions think that the GLA should be supported, not stripped down. It should be extended to other high-risk sectors, including construction, hospitality and social care so that rogue employers know that there is no hiding place for those who exploit working people.

TUC General Secretary Frances O'Grady marked the anniversary of the disaster by saying: "The GLA provides vital safeguards for people in high-risk industries, it ensures that people are paid the minimum wage and makes sure apprentices are not exploited."

Also see:

TUC press release: Workers are still at risk 10 years on from Morecambe Bay

TUC Blog: 10 years on from Morecambe Bay, what's happening to gangmaster regulation?

ETI's blog covers issues at the intersection of business and human rights. We feature posts by, for and from our members and allies; we do not accept or offer payment for posts or publish content outside of these criteria. We welcome a range of insights and opinions from our guest bloggers, though don't necessarily agree with everything they say.

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Blog RSS

Related content

  • GAIA workplace booklet & guidance
  • Child labour and modern slavery: free advice for companies
  • Modern slavery and child labour: it's all about choice
  • 71% of modern day slaves are women: new statistics launched at UN General Assembly
  • Ethical trade in the 1850s: breaking the chains of slavery
  • Latest thinking on ending modern slavery and child labour

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on responsible business.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127