Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • About ETI
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members
    • Our Strategy
  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful stakeholder engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equity in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
      • RPP in manufacturing
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
      • Blog series: Tackling gender-based violence through GRACE
    • Issues
      • Human rights due diligence (HRDD): a complete guide for business
        • What is human rights due diligence?
        • Human rights due diligence legislation and regulatory requirements
        • How to implement human rights due diligence in your company
        • HRDD risk assessment for supply chains
        • Supplier engagement and human rights due diligence
      • Forced labour & modern slavery: a complete guide for business
        • What is modern slavery? Definitions, forms and scale
        • How to identify forced labour in your supply chain
        • Remediation: what to do when forced labour is found
        • Modern slavery legislation: what businesses need to know
        • EU Forced Labour Regulation: what it means for your business
        • How to write a modern slavery statement
        • High-risk sectors and sourcing regions for forced labour
        • Forced labour and migrant workers in supply chains
      • Responsible purchasing practices: what they are and why they matter
        • How to implement responsible purchasing practices
        • Responsible purchasing practices and legislation: what companies need to know
        • Responsible purchasing practices by sector
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
      • ETI Insights series
    • Impact report 2024-25

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. blog

ETI responds to the publication of the Government's response to its consultation on transparency in supply chains

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Lindsay Wright - ETI
  • 23 September 2020

Earlier this week, the Government published its s response to the transparency in supply chains consultation, to which ETI made a formal submission, after lengthy consultation with its members.

In our response, we called for reporting areas to be mandated, and we are pleased that this recommendation has been followed.  

We have been calling for a level playing field on modern slavery reporting for a number of years, and this change will give companies, including ETI members, more clarity on what is expected of them, drive up reporting standards, and increase transparency. The introduction of a single reporting deadline each year is also welcome, creating a fixed date in the diary when all statements are published together and enabling greater scrutiny, and focus on the issue, by the media, investors, and consumers. 

Our consultation response also recommended that Section 54 should be extended to large public bodies, and we are again pleased that the Government has taken this important step, referencing our recommendation on page 16 of its response. Many public sector organisations share suppliers with private companies, but face less stringent transparency and reporting obligations, enabling them to avoid the reputational pressure that is driving good practice among many larger retailers.

Leveraging the purchasing power and influence of, for example, large bodies such as the NHS will make a significant difference. Ultimately it cannot only be responsible companies that comply with both the letter and intent of the Modern Slavery ACT and we hope that these changes will come with a greater determination to call to account those who do not take their obligations seriously; all forms of modern slavery have no place in our society or business.

 

ETI's blog covers issues at the intersection of business and human rights. We feature posts by, for and from our members and allies; we do not accept or offer payment for posts or publish content outside of these criteria. We welcome a range of insights and opinions from our guest bloggers, though don't necessarily agree with everything they say.

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Blog RSS

Related content

  • Supply chain management in East Asia
  • Forget blockchain. First, get the right address
  • Guest blog: Katie Shaw - sharing supplier data on the Open Apparel Registry results in tangible improvements in supply chains
  • New Member Focus: Thought
  • New member focus: Trutex
  • Q&A: Adil Khan, CEO of new ETI member Liberty

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on responsible business.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127