Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful Stakeholder Engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equality in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
    • Annual impact report
  • About ETI
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. blog

Let’s leave no place to hide for suppliers who still use unlicensed labour

  • Nick Kightley
  • 2 September 2020

It’s great news that the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority (GLAA) has intervened to stop a Scottish vegetable growing business from using workers provided to them by an unlicensed recruitment agency.

The GLAA served a Labour Market Enforcement Undertaking to the business based in Angus, north-east Scotland, which supplies vegetables to major supermarkets across the UK.

But it’s also worrying that this grower even thought that the use of unlicensed labour was allowed. The law is clear – the Gangmasters (Licensing Act) requires people to have a licence to provide workers to the fresh produce sector, and it’s a criminal offence to use an unlicensed provider - and there have been multiple warnings to growers and suppliers.

ETI would like to hear from the Angus grower to understand how this breakdown in procedure came about. Did the system fail in this case? Was the grower let down by its regular labour provider? Was there undue pressure from buyers?

Supermarkets need to be hypervigilant over these kinds of breaches of the law, so they can take action at an early stage and prevent abuses of this kind taking hold. Supermarkets have invested heavily in due diligence procedures, but the fact that this supplier slipped through the net shows how vital proactive and continuous surveillance is, along with a commitment to extend supply chain transparency beyond just the first and second tiers.

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Blog RSS

Related content

  • Myanmar MSI Public Statement
  • Gender inequality in international supply chains
  • Addressing worker vulnerability in agricultural and food supply chains (vulnerable workers toolkit)
  • Homeworker project resource downloads
  • ETI joins call for rethink by PM on aid cuts
  • A new vision for the garment industry. What next?

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on ethical trade.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127