Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • About ETI
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members
    • Our Strategy
  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful stakeholder engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equity in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
      • RPP in manufacturing
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
      • Blog series: Tackling gender-based violence through GRACE
    • Issues
      • Human rights due diligence (HRDD): a complete guide for business
        • What is human rights due diligence?
        • Human rights due diligence legislation and regulatory requirements
        • How to implement human rights due diligence in your company
        • HRDD risk assessment for supply chains
        • Supplier engagement and human rights due diligence
      • Forced labour & modern slavery: a complete guide for business
        • What is modern slavery? Definitions, forms and scale
        • How to identify forced labour in your supply chain
        • Remediation: what to do when forced labour is found
        • Modern slavery legislation: what businesses need to know
        • EU Forced Labour Regulation: what it means for your business
        • How to write a modern slavery statement
        • High-risk sectors and sourcing regions for forced labour
        • Forced labour and migrant workers in supply chains
      • Responsible purchasing practices: what they are and why they matter
        • How to implement responsible purchasing practices
        • Responsible purchasing practices and legislation: what companies need to know
        • Responsible purchasing practices by sector
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
      • ETI Insights series
    • Impact report 2024-25

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. blog

Nick Kightley issues a call to ETI corporate members to explore a way forward in cleaning up the palm oil industry

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Nick Kightley - ETI
  • 29 September 2020

Companies should hang their heads in shame for failing to resolve the palm oil disgrace many years ago. And in truth, there will be very, very few ETI corporate members not associated with the oil palm industry and hence with the multiple failures that continue to be tolerated. To be fair, many of these charges might equally apply to cocoa, tea and banana plantations. But the tale of State and industry failures in relation to labour rights abuses in palm oil is a particularly bitter pill that responsible businesses need to swallow.  

Palm oil can be found in pretty much every processed food product you can think of – from crisps, crackers and confectionery to margarine, breakfast cereal and tinned goods – and of course cosmetics, soaps and shampoos etc. 

But is this crop really too valuable to call into question? Has the time come for a far more ‘hands on’ approach and such as vertical integration, supply chain transparency and full accountability as part of an ethical trading commitment? Should retailers and brands be thinking in terms of buying and running their own oil palm plantations and oil mills, as the only means of regaining any kind of pride in their ethical standing when it comes to palm oil?  

It is not acceptable to state a policy of not tolerating worker exploitation and unsustainable business practices if in reality those same companies continue to trade in palm oil from Malaysia and Indonesia with such little impact to tackle the failings. 

To be a “clean” company, companies must either: 

  • separate themselves from those businesses failing to act responsibly and demonstrate how they will continue operations without sliding back into these trading relationships again 

OR 

  • make a public stand and actively and overtly work with failing companies to change their practices in such a way that the outside world can see the impact. 

Sadly for now, I see neither of these courses of action being seriously followed. But that has to change.  I invite any ETI corporate members reading this to please contact me at ETI so that we can explore a road map for ethical trading in this context for the future. 

ETI's blog covers issues at the intersection of business and human rights. We feature posts by, for and from our members and allies; we do not accept or offer payment for posts or publish content outside of these criteria. We welcome a range of insights and opinions from our guest bloggers, though don't necessarily agree with everything they say.

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Blog RSS

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on responsible business.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127