Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • About ETI
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members
    • Our Strategy
  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful stakeholder engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equity in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
      • RPP in manufacturing
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
      • Blog series: Tackling gender-based violence through GRACE
    • Issues
      • Human rights due diligence (HRDD): a complete guide for business
        • What is human rights due diligence?
        • Human rights due diligence legislation and regulatory requirements
        • How to implement human rights due diligence in your company
        • HRDD risk assessment for supply chains
        • Supplier engagement and human rights due diligence
      • Forced labour & modern slavery: a complete guide for business
        • What is modern slavery? Definitions, forms and scale
        • How to identify forced labour in your supply chain
        • Remediation: what to do when forced labour is found
        • Modern slavery legislation: what businesses need to know
        • EU Forced Labour Regulation: what it means for your business
        • How to write a modern slavery statement
        • High-risk sectors and sourcing regions for forced labour
        • Forced labour and migrant workers in supply chains
      • Responsible purchasing practices: what they are and why they matter
        • How to implement responsible purchasing practices
        • Responsible purchasing practices and legislation: what companies need to know
        • Responsible purchasing practices by sector
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
      • ETI Insights series
    • Impact report 2024-25

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. blog

ETI fully supports IndustriALL’s Framework Principles for responsible disengagement from Myanmar

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • ETI
  • 1 March 2023

Ongoing repression by the military in Myanmar, following a coup d’état in February 2021, throws up significant challenges to business who operate in the country.

An independent assessment commissioned by ETI, explored the application of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) in this context and raised very serious concerns. While not providing individual advice the assessment set out to answer three key questions:

  • To what extent can companies in the sector monitor, prevent, mitigate, and provide access to remedy (where appropriate) on severe human rights impacts that the sector may be involved with in Myanmar in the current and developing context? ​
  • What are the requirements of the UNGPS and OECD guidelines for companies when considering whether to continue sourcing or withdraw from Myanmar in the current context?​
  • And what would constitute responsible exit?

On this final question there are now Framework Principles for responsible disengagement by brands, agreed by IndustriALL Global Union with inputs from garment brands. ETI fully supports this framework and encourages any garment brand active in Myanmar planning to disengage to follow these principles. We would encourage all brands that continue to source to familiarise themselves with these principles, given how dynamic the situation in Myanmar is.

All brands that continue to source from Myanmar should do so in line with the UNGPs, which requires transparency on their reasons continued business in the country and on extra measures taken to identify and mitigate human rights risks, and ensure remediation when violations occur.

While this framework for responsible disengagement was developed with participation of one sector, we feel that the advice is relevant for all businesses engaged in Myanmar, that might consider withdrawing.

 

ETI's blog covers issues at the intersection of business and human rights. We feature posts by, for and from our members and allies; we do not accept or offer payment for posts or publish content outside of these criteria. We welcome a range of insights and opinions from our guest bloggers, though don't necessarily agree with everything they say.

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Blog RSS

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on responsible business.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127