Skip to main content
Home

User Menu

  • Log in

Main menu

  • Home
  • About ETI
    • Our members
    • What we do
    • Why we exist
      • ETI's origins
    • Our impact for workers
    • Accountability
    • Funding
    • Our strategy
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members
    • Contact
  • ETI Base Code
    • 1. Employment is freely chosen
    • 2. Freedom of association
    • 3. Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • 4. Child labour shall not be used
    • 5. Living wages are paid
    • 6. Working hours are not excessive
    • 7. No discrimination is practiced
    • 8. Regular employment is provided
    • 9. No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Programmes
  • Join ETI
  • Training
    • All courses
    • Essentials of ethical trade series
    • E-Learning Module: Access to Remedy Principles
    • Bespoke training
  • Resources
    • Case studies
    • Useful links
  • Issues
    • Gender equity
      • Violence and harrassment
      • Gender data initiative
      • Gender equality - international standards
      • Gender equality - resources
    • Homeworkers
    • COVID-19
    • Grievance mechanisms & remedy
    • Union rights at work
    • Due diligence
      • ETI’s work on human rights due diligence
        • ETI’s work in Pakistan
        • Pakistan, labour rights resources
      • Resources on human rights due diligence
    • Company purchasing practices
      • Working conditions in the Leicester garment industry
    • A living wage for workers
      • Living wage initiatives
      • Living wage resources
      • Living wage standards
      • Wages and purchasing theories
    • Modern slavery
      • Modern slavery and transparency standards
      • Modern slavery initiatives
      • Modern slavery resources
      • Modern slavery evaluation framework
    • Public procurement & responsible business
    • Migrant workers
    • Business and human rights in India
    • Child labour
    • HIV at work
    • Ethical trade and fairtrade
  • Blog
  • Events

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. blog

The New Responsible Fishing Vessel Standard - allowing responsible operators to stand out, and be counted

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Nick Kightley
  • 14 January 2021
Thai fishermen

On behalf of ETI and its member companies, NGOs and trade unions, I would like to congratulate GSA. I have over recent years been a member of the Oversight Board at Seafish and more recently a member of the Advisory Committee for Global Seafood Assurances.

As such, I have helped create and shape a new Standard – the Responsible Fishing Vessel Standard – now, not just a UK Standard, but a new Global Standard.

While ETI does not argue that Standards alone can bring about the sort of fundamental changes needed to correct all the injustices committed towards fishing vessel crews, I do believe that this Standard paves the way for progressive improvements that will protect many existing crew and will provide a challenge that any company that claims to be a responsible fisheries business will need to take up.

This interview with the Managing Director of Australian Longline Fishing, Malcolm McNeill, makes for a really interesting read. Malcom in his interview demonstrates some of the value in such Standards as they hold up good practice, encourage continuous improvement and present responsible business alternatives that buyers and retailers can then identify and favour over lower performing practitioners. And, in an industry such as fishing, with all the associated risks to health and safety, risks of slavery and the destruction of our sustainable fish stocks, this feels like an important step.

Business can go so far in driving good practice as directed by the UNGPs, but States have a clear role too in bringing change. The RVFS should help to allow good practitioners to stand out and be counted.

The more that we can draw a clear line between those businesses that are responsible and ethical and those that are not, the better we will be able to then shine a spot light on bad practice and IUU fishing in particular. Once identified, these poor standard and often illegal operators need to be the focus of regulators and prosecutors. Business can go so far in driving good practice as directed by the UNGPs, but States have a clear role too in bringing change. The RVFS should help to allow good practitioners to stand out and be counted.

I encourage all ETI commercial members to support this new standard by specifying that their suppliers all seek RVFS certification and so help raise standards and protect workers and fish stocks.”

ETI's blog covers issues at the intersection of business and human rights. We feature posts by, for and from our members and allies; we do not accept or offer payment for posts or publish content outside of these criteria. We welcome a range of insights and opinions from our guest bloggers, though don't necessarily agree with everything they say.

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Blog RSS

Related content

  • ETI position statement on modern slavery
  • Migrant worker exploitation in UK agriculture: ETI statement
  • ETI Annual review 2018-19
  • ETI Annual review 2017-18
  • Japan's new law banning IUU seafood is a key step towards establishing a level playing field
  • ETI supermarket members call on government to pilot mandatory licensing of car washes

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on ethical trade.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Privacy
  • Modern slavery statement
Other ETIs: Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127