Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful Stakeholder Engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equality in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
    • Annual impact report
  • About ETI
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. blog

ETI expresses serious concerns over activist Andy Hall's ‘defamation’ verdict by Thai court

  • Jane Moyo
  • 20 September 2016

Nick Kightley, ETI’s food and farming lead has expressed serious concerns over the guilty verdict for defamation handed down to workers’ rights campaigner Andy Hall in Thailand.

This follows publication of research into migrant workers’ conditions of employment in the Thai fruit industry authored and published by corporate responsibility NGO, Finnwatch.

Thailand is a major global food exporter but is known to experience widespread exploitation issues in its supply chains.

 “It is safe to say that the court decision was not one that was expected,” Nick Kightley said.

He continued: “Andy Hall has played – and continues to play – a key role in exposing issues around injustice and abuse of migrant workers.

“He is also recognised as a man who wants to work with companies to help them improve their employment practices."

Additionally, Nick Kightley commented: "While due process under law is crucially important, so equally is the broader context of ensuring the ability of human rights defenders to challenge vested interests.

“This verdict is therefore doubly worrying.

“As well as potentially criminalising the research function, it could encourage a closing of corporate doors when we are just beginning to see movement from progressive managers in local Thai companies.”

While the court's decision must be respected, ETI will discuss ways forward with our member companies and partner organisations in Thailand while raising the issue with appropriate Thai government officials.

ENDS

Released by the Communications Unit, Ethical Trading Initiative, +44 (0)20 7841 4350

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Blog RSS

Related content

  • ETI position: Uygher workers in global supply chains
  • Grievance mechanisms in agriculture - Briefing note
  • Access to remedy: a migrant worker's right
  • Exploitation of migrant labour in the UK Seasonal Agriculture Workers’ Scheme
  • Practical recommendations for implementation of remedy principles
  • GLJ-ILRF letter to US state on Thailand’s Tier 2 ranking in Trafficking in Persons Report 2020

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on ethical trade.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127