Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful stakeholder engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equality in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
      • RPP in manufacturing
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
      • ETI Insights series
    • Annual impact report
  • About ETI
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. blog

ETI responds to JURI Committee vote on Omnibus I

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • ETI
  • 14 October 2025
General view inside the European Parliament. Photo credit: Shutterstock.

The Ethical Trading Initiative (ETI) is concerned that the European Parliament’s recent Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI) vote on the Omnibus I package, under the European Commission’s proposal, undermines the hard-won gains of the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD).

While it’s welcome that the compromise maintains a due diligence framework, it excludes most companies by limiting the rules to those with over 5,000 employees and €1.5 billion turnover. This change could reduce the number of companies in scope by up to 70%. It will penalise those businesses that have already invested in human rights and environmental due diligence, fail to level the playing-field, and undermine the long-term competitiveness and sustainability of European company supply chains.

Other setbacks include weakened safeguards on responsible disengagement and reduced requirements for meaningful dialogue between buyers and suppliers. In practice, this limits progress against some of the most important underlying issues in supply chains, including living wages, company purchasing practices and traceability.

Giles Bolton, Executive Director at ETI, said:

"Strong due diligence is essential to protect workers and enable companies to build resilient supply chains. Narrowing the scope and leaving gaps in accountability risks undermining progress by responsible businesses, civil society, and trade unions to date - and misses a huge opportunity to strengthen Europe’s supply chains as a whole. Europe must not retreat from its leadership on sustainability."

ETI stresses that a robust and enforceable due diligence framework is vital to protect workers, uphold human rights, and support responsible business conduct across global supply chains. We will continue to advocate for mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence (mHREDD) in line with our tripartite consulted position, which reflects the shared perspectives of trade unions, NGOs, and companies. 

This position calls for legislation that ensures all enterprises conduct meaningful due diligence across their value chains, with affected workers, communities, and other rightsholders central to the process, and that enforcement mechanisms, transparency, and accountability are strong enough to drive systemic change in practice. We will continue to work with companies, trade unions, NGOs, and EU institutions to advocate for a framework aligned with the UN Guiding Principles and capable of delivering real-world impact.

File(s)

ETI position on mandatory Human Rights and Environmental Due Diligence Regulation

Sets out ETI's position on the human rights elements that should be embedded in any regulation on mandatory Human Rights and Environmental Due Diligence (mHREDD) in the UK, and where relevant, in other countries.
Read more
ETI's blog covers issues at the intersection of business and human rights. We feature posts by, for and from our members and allies; we do not accept or offer payment for posts or publish content outside of these criteria. We welcome a range of insights and opinions from our guest bloggers, though don't necessarily agree with everything they say.

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Blog RSS

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on ethical trade.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127