Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • About ETI
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members
    • Our Strategy
  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful stakeholder engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equity in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
      • RPP in manufacturing
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
      • Blog series: Tackling gender-based violence through GRACE
    • Issues
      • Human rights due diligence (HRDD): a complete guide for business
        • What is human rights due diligence?
        • Human rights due diligence legislation and regulatory requirements
        • How to implement human rights due diligence in your company
        • HRDD risk assessment for supply chains
        • Supplier engagement and human rights due diligence
      • Forced labour & modern slavery: a complete guide for business
        • What is modern slavery? Definitions, forms and scale
        • How to identify forced labour in your supply chain
        • Remediation: what to do when forced labour is found
        • Modern slavery legislation: what businesses need to know
        • EU Forced Labour Regulation: what it means for your business
        • How to write a modern slavery statement
        • High-risk sectors and sourcing regions for forced labour
        • Forced labour and migrant workers in supply chains
      • Responsible purchasing practices: what they are and why they matter
        • How to implement responsible purchasing practices
        • Responsible purchasing practices and legislation: what companies need to know
        • Responsible purchasing practices by sector
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
      • ETI Insights series
    • Impact report 2024-25

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. blog

Two years since the Myanmar military coup

  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Peter McAllister - ETI
  • 1 February 2023
Masked women sit in protest against the military coup, holding red signs in English and Burmese. Photo credit: Wikicommons/ MgHla.

Two years have past since a coup in Myanmar displaced the democratic elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi. The civil unrest that followed was met with a brutal crackdown from the military junta.

In addition to the violent suppression of political and civil rights, the rights of workers have been significantly impacted. This includes the ability of unions to operate freely and consult with or represent workers. Substantial limitations on civic freedom continue to obstruct civil society and the international organisations upon which responsible business can usually rely, from operating as normal, leaving few if any checks and balances on military rule.

In the wake of the coup, debates about whether businesses could continue operating and sourcing from Myanmar while meeting international standards and responsible business guidelines emerged. To provide greater insight on this issue for the export-oriented garment sector, ETI commissioned an independent evidence-based assessment on the context of human rights and responsible business conduct within Myanmar in 2021. This assessment was conducted by Due Diligence Design, with research and analysis from partners Impactt; expert guidance on the implications of the UNGPs from SHIFT; and consultation with OHCHR, OECD and ILO. 

The findings are clear; the context does not allow for normal responsible business and therefore companies need to review their sourcing and take into account the demands by unions among others to withdraw. The UNGPs are clear, that failure of a government to protect its citizens does not affect the responsibility of business to ensure that workers in their supply chains are not being exploited in this high risk environment.

There is a need for greater pressure from the international community to create a pathway for a return to democracy as a matter of urgency. In the meantime any company doing business in Myanmar should at the very least review their operations and relationships to ensure that they are not supporting the military and are, to the greatest extent possible, protecting workers' rights.

ETI's blog covers issues at the intersection of business and human rights. We feature posts by, for and from our members and allies; we do not accept or offer payment for posts or publish content outside of these criteria. We welcome a range of insights and opinions from our guest bloggers, though don't necessarily agree with everything they say.

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Blog RSS

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on responsible business.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127