Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful Stakeholder Engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equality in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
    • Annual impact report
  • About ETI
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. guidance and reports

Business models & labour standards: making the connection

  • Public
  • 4 March 2019
  • Tools, Guidelines & Briefings
Subject(s)
Business practice
Purchasing practices
Living wage
Business models & labour standards: making the connection

Despite retailers spending significant sums on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and other related initiatives, little progress is being made in terms of developing substantive improvements in working conditions for production workers. Commissioned by ETI and in partnership with Kings College London and University of Warwick, this report explores two key weaknesses in current business models:

First, at the level of production, CSR initiatives have been criticised for being little more than a ‘sticking plaster’ and for being more about protection of corporate reputations than really improving the conditions of workers.

Secondly, and the main focus of this report, is that while such initiatives may be well meaning, they are aimed at treating the symptoms of the problem rather than tackling the underlying causes: the very nature of the business model.

 

Related content

  • Responsible Purchasing Practices - manufacturing case studies
  • ETI insights: Responsible Purchasing Practices – Driving change in manufacturing
  • Common Framework for Responsible Purchasing Practices in Manufacturing Industries (CFRPP MI)
  • Responsible purchasing practices in manufacturing industries
  • ETI Impact report 2021-23
  • Common Framework for Responsible Purchasing Practices in Food

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on ethical trade.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127