Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • About ETI
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members
    • Our Strategy
  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful stakeholder engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equity in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
      • RPP in manufacturing
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
      • Blog series: Tackling gender-based violence through GRACE
    • Issues
      • Human rights due diligence (HRDD): a complete guide for business
        • What is human rights due diligence?
        • Human rights due diligence legislation and regulatory requirements
        • How to implement human rights due diligence in your company
        • HRDD risk assessment for supply chains
        • Supplier engagement and human rights due diligence
      • Forced labour & modern slavery: a complete guide for business
        • What is modern slavery? Definitions, forms and scale
        • How to identify forced labour in your supply chain
        • Remediation: what to do when forced labour is found
        • Modern slavery legislation: what businesses need to know
        • EU Forced Labour Regulation: what it means for your business
        • How to write a modern slavery statement
        • High-risk sectors and sourcing regions for forced labour
        • Forced labour and migrant workers in supply chains
      • Responsible purchasing practices: what they are and why they matter
        • How to implement responsible purchasing practices
        • Responsible purchasing practices and legislation: what companies need to know
        • Responsible purchasing practices by sector
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
      • ETI Insights series
    • Impact report 2024-25

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. guidance and reports

CCC's response to the 'Review of H&M group’s Roadmap to Fair Living Wage'

  • Public
  • 2 May 2019
  • Tools, Guidelines & Briefings
Subject(s)
Living wage

Following scrutiny of H&M's 2013 'Roadmap to a fair living wage' by Clean Clothes Campaign (CCC), ETI published an evaluation of the brand's progress over 5 years (December 2018). In turn, CCC has published a response to that review by ETI. In the interests of transparency, we also share that response, below.

CCC's response to the 'Review of H&M group’s Roadmap to Fair Living Wage'

CCC's introduction to the response reads:

'In 2013, H&M published its ‘Roadmap towards a fair living wage’, in which the fast fashion retailer laid out several goals for the years to follow. They included a commitment for 850,000 workers to be paid a living wage by 2018. 

In the wake of public scrutiny over H&M’s failure to meet that commitment, Ethical Trading Initiative (ETI) was asked by H&M – one of ETI’s dues paying members, along with Asos, C&A, Inditex and others – to perform an evaluation of the brand’s progress over the past five years (2014-2018). In December 2018, this evaluation was published as the “Review of H&M group’s Roadmap to fair Living Wage” (hereafter: the Review).

Clean Clothes Campaign International office (hereafter: CCC) was one of the stakeholders that ETI contacted in its research phase. Some of our assessments of H&M’s living wage work are reflected in the Review, and we agree with most of ETI’s recommendations. However, we were surprised to note that some essential information is not highlighted strongly enough or is completely missing from the Review. We believe that including this information would have led to additional findings and recommendations.

This paper lays out key shortcomings of the Review that are strongly intertwined with the shortcomings of H&M’s roadmap itself, and even more so with the way H&M approached its implementation.'

Related content

  • ACT - initiative on living wages
  • Living wage initiatives
  • Living wage resources
  • Living wage in the tea industry
  • Are we at the tipping point for getting the living wage in supply chains?
  • THE LEADERSHIP SERIES: ETI and me – why it’s important to empathise, talk and act to change supply chains

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on responsible business.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127