Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful Stakeholder Engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equality in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
    • Annual impact report
  • About ETI
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. guidance and reports

CCC's response to the 'Review of H&M group’s Roadmap to Fair Living Wage'

  • Public
  • 2 May 2019
  • Tools, Guidelines & Briefings
Subject(s)
Living wage

Following scrutiny of H&M's 2013 'Roadmap to a fair living wage' by Clean Clothes Campaign (CCC), ETI published an evaluation of the brand's progress over 5 years (December 2018). In turn, CCC has published a response to that review by ETI. In the interests of transparency, we also share that response, below.

CCC's response to the 'Review of H&M group’s Roadmap to Fair Living Wage'

CCC's introduction to the response reads:

'In 2013, H&M published its ‘Roadmap towards a fair living wage’, in which the fast fashion retailer laid out several goals for the years to follow. They included a commitment for 850,000 workers to be paid a living wage by 2018. 

In the wake of public scrutiny over H&M’s failure to meet that commitment, Ethical Trading Initiative (ETI) was asked by H&M – one of ETI’s dues paying members, along with Asos, C&A, Inditex and others – to perform an evaluation of the brand’s progress over the past five years (2014-2018). In December 2018, this evaluation was published as the “Review of H&M group’s Roadmap to fair Living Wage” (hereafter: the Review).

Clean Clothes Campaign International office (hereafter: CCC) was one of the stakeholders that ETI contacted in its research phase. Some of our assessments of H&M’s living wage work are reflected in the Review, and we agree with most of ETI’s recommendations. However, we were surprised to note that some essential information is not highlighted strongly enough or is completely missing from the Review. We believe that including this information would have led to additional findings and recommendations.

This paper lays out key shortcomings of the Review that are strongly intertwined with the shortcomings of H&M’s roadmap itself, and even more so with the way H&M approached its implementation.'

Related content

  • Conference briefing note, ‘Living Wage: Taking the Leap of Faith’
  • Review of H&M group’s roadmap to fair living wage
  • Business models & labour standards: making the connection
  • The journey towards Living Wage [infographic]
  • Living Wages in Global Supply Chains: a new agenda for business
  • ACT initiative factsheet

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on ethical trade.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127