Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful Stakeholder Engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equality in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
    • Annual impact report
  • About ETI
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. blog

Companies can’t outsource due diligence if they want to end modern slavery in their supply chains

  • Cindy Berman
  • 1 April 2016
Copyright: Denis Nata

April 1st is a landmark date. Under new government regulations, all companies that operate in the UK with an annual turnover of over £36 million must publish an annual statement showing the steps they have taken to ensure there is no slavery or human trafficking either in their business or in their supply chain. 


New advanced training course: Human rights due diligence


With some companies already producing statements, we’re beginning to get a sense of how seriously companies are taking their commitments under the Act. Are they viewing it as a PR or light-touch exercise, or as something that can help bring about transformational change if done properly? 


Disappointingly, the vast majority of initial reports failed to comply with the legislation, as a Business & Human Rights Resource Centre/CORE report revealed, and which I commented on in my last blog. I hope the next tranche will be better but I’m not all that optimistic. Why? 


It appears that many companies, in their endeavour to comply with the legislation, are being tempted to do what they’ve always done. Outsource.


Companies as a matter of course contract goods and services for sale. And now they’re outsourcing their due diligence on modern slavery to external contractors and consultants. This is a bad mistake.


A growing industry of contractors claiming to sort out modern slavery


We know this much: the nature of modern slavery is complex, and most of it is hidden beneath a veil of secrecy, fear, complicity and deception.  It cannot be treated in the same way as businesses might treat other problems, which is to find someone who knows about the issue and get them to sort it out.  


Yet I see a vast stream of offers every day from a growing industry of ambulance-chasers claiming to be able to sort out modern slavery for companies.


Legal advice. An app. A new IT database. Novel audit methodologies. Quick-fix training.


There is no shortage of profit-making organisations ready to offer these services. For a price. Lawyers, auditors, and consultants are all offering to help companies identify their risks and write their modern slavery statements and human rights policies. 


Companies are buying these services out of panic, fear and confusion rather than pausing, taking a deep breath and looking in their respective organisational mirrors to better understand the problem and find their own solutions.


So what is it about corporate culture that is so wedded to this out-sourcing model?


Companies appear to think that because they are contracting the services of so called ‘experts’ this will be seen as an indication of how seriously they are taking the modern slavery issue.


There is a clear risk in outsourcing modern slavery expertise


I’m not for a moment suggesting that companies shouldn’t seek to enlist expertise. No-one expects company staff to be experts on modern slavery or forced labour.


But the risk of out-sourcing due diligence and risk management is that is treated as a ‘project’. There is a deliverable – a statement, a policy, a toolkit – and the company treats it as a box ticked in their list of ‘to do’s’.


Leaving aside the exorbitant financial costs of outsourcing this work, the heaviest price for taking this approach will be paid by the company because it has outsourced knowledge, learning and ownership.


’Expert’ contractors pocket a fat cheque, gain new insights on companies and their supply chains, and have a portfolio of experience and insight that helps them market themselves to other willing customers.  But the company is left holding all the risk. It is no less wise on how to tackle or prevent the problem. Nor does it have the right level of ownership to drive solutions within its own company.  


The result? No change from what we see now…. companies lurching from one crisis to the next, trying to respond to media stories, campaigns or criminal liability cases that expose abusive labour practices in their supply chains or operations.


Companies must build internal capability and engage directly with workers


Companies should spend their time and money more wisely. They should build their internal capability and leadership - having hard conversations internally about what needs to change in their sourcing, purchasing and human resources practices. Short-term fixes may be tempting, but this kind of investment will pay off far more in the long-term.  


 And of course, the most effective form of due diligence is to engage directly with workers and their representatives. Because workers that can advocate for themselves and negotiate their own terms and conditions are not at risk of modern slavery.


Sounds simple, but there is a long and complex road to achieving this.


It will involve companies building trusted relationships with trade unions and NGOs, engaging with governments, and drawing on appropriate expertise to help shine a light on the problem or advise on how it might be tackled.


But that cannot replace the work that businesses must then do to build internal buy-in, figure out what needs to change, who needs to lead it, and how to make it happen.


The bottom line? A ‘business as usual’ approach just won’t work with modern slavery. 


Find out about our Modern Slavery workshops

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Blog RSS

Related content

  • EU Forced Labour Regulation: Legislation factsheet
  • Prison labour briefing
  • Myanmar enhanced due diligence sectoral assessment
  • Public sector supply chain conference report
  • Thai Seafood Working Group Letter to Obama
  • North Korea state-sponsored forced labour: briefing note

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on ethical trade.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127