Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful Stakeholder Engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equality in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
    • Annual impact report
  • About ETI
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. blog

What is state-imposed forced labour?

  • Lindsay Wright
  • 28 October 2019

The issue of forced labour in private sector supply chains is rising up the business agenda.

But what happens when the forced labour is imposed by the State itself, perhaps as a systematic practice of punishing political dissidents or religious minorities? 

Many companies are unaware of the use of state-imposed forced labour (SIFL) in their supply chains, but any business tainted by forced labour will not only suffer severe reputational damage, but could also be subject to litigation.

There are generally two distinct types of SIFL: compulsory labour by citizens, for example when national or local authorities force otherwise free citizens to work, perhaps during harvest season or as a means of mobilising labour for economic development; and work carried out by prisoners and detainees in breach of ILO Forced Labour Conventions. The exploitation of prison labour in some industrialized countries also constitutes forced labour, as prisoners in private prisons are expected to work for wages way below legal minimum wage. 

ETI has published a briefing paper on SIFL, with recommended actions companies can take both individually, and jointly with industrial groups and other stakeholders, to prevent and remediate forced labour. 

There is also advice for companies on knowing when, and how, to stop sourcing from a country or region affected by SIFL. 

The briefing is free to download via the ETI website. 

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Blog RSS

Related content

  • EU Forced Labour Regulation: Legislation factsheet
  • Migrant worker exploitation in UK agriculture: ETI statement
  • Labour standards in Pakistan’s surgical instruments sector
  • Public sector supply chain conference report
  • ETI response to government consultation on transparency in supply chains
  • Base Code guidance: caste in global supply chains

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on ethical trade.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127