Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful stakeholder engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equality in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
      • RPP in manufacturing
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
      • ETI Insights series
    • Annual impact report
  • About ETI
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. case studies

Collective MSE as a critical part of heightened HRDD (hHRDD) amid crisis in Bangladesh

Workers protesting unpaid wages, Bangladesh
Programmes
Garments from Bangladesh
Sectors
Garments

The context 

Since July 2024, Bangladesh has experienced significant civil unrest, political upheaval, and devastating floods. These overlapping crises have disrupted the country at large, severely impacting garment supply chains and increasing human rights risks for workers in the RMG sector. When crisis hits — whether due to conflict, political instability, or extreme weather — meaningful stakeholder engagement (MSE) becomes more challenging: how can we engage with those affected without diverting crucial attention and resources from the crisis response? 

The value of Collective MSE efforts during crisis 

Effective human rights due diligence (HRDD) depends on meaningful engagement with affected stakeholders to inform timely and relevant actions. Amid the political and climate disruptions of 2024, the Ethical Trading Initiative (ETI) and ETI Bangladesh facilitated collective MSE involving international brands, trade unions, civil society, and manufacturers. The aim was to support businesses to integrate human rights considerations into their decision-making processes and crucially, to ensure a coordinated approach, even in a volatile context. 

In practice, dialogue between local stakeholders and international brands was maintained through 

  • Direct outreach to 60 factories to assess the impact of the crisis on manufacturing operations and supply chains.
  • Engagement with rightsholderrepresentatives, including structured collective meetings between trade union leaders, industry associations, and brands, enabling affected groups to voice their concerns and priorities.
  • Consolidation of insights from these engagements into actionable industry recommendations for responsible business conduct and hHRDD during the crisis.
  • Feedback loops with rightsholders, particularly through consultations with trade union leaders, to validate whether the recommendations addressed the risks and priorities they had communicated. 

A coalition of 10 multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs), industry bodies, and trade unions adopted the final recommendations. This collective endorsement was critical in aligning responses across the sector, reducing consultation fatigue and pressure on local stakeholders. 

This case highlights the critical role that a collective approach to MSE can play, especially during a crisis, where meaningful stakeholder engagement becomes more challenging, but even more essential. Through a collective approach facilitated by ETI and ETI Bangladesh, companies and brands were able to engage directly from suppliers and trade unions and coordinate an aligned response –reducing engagement fatigue and duplicative efforts.   

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Blog RSS

Related content

  • Collective MSE for Risk Identification: Investigation into GBVH in James Finlay Kenya (JFK)
  • Collective MSE for policy development and commitment: GAIA
  • Collective MSE for prevention and mitigation: Rajasthan sandstone programme
  • Primark: Embedding a commitment to responsible purchasing practices
  • ETI and the STITCH partnership
  • Exploring the socio-economic impact of the living wage gap - case studies from Bangladesh, India & Pakistan

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on ethical trade.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127