Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful Stakeholder Engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equality in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
    • Annual impact report
  • About ETI
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. blog

Nick Kightley, ETI's Strategic Lead for Food, Farming and Fisheries respond's to Oxfam's 2020 Behind the Barcodes scorecard

  • Nick Kightley
  • 30 June 2020

It is encouraging to see that ETI membership continues to mean something when it comes to the rankings of supermarkets by policies and practices. ETI members hold 5 of the top 6 places in this league table of 16 and Tesco continues to be the benchmark against which to measure others.

In contrast to the top few, it is quite shocking to see just how poorly some other supermarkets compare – even though they now know exactly how this data will be shared. Good practice may be challenging, but having policies that respect workers is fundamental to the integrity of a company – isn’t it?

  • UK scorecard
  • Global scorecard and data
  • Overall percentage improvement 2019-20

The current Covid-19 pandemic has asked questions of all supermarkets. Do they stick to their principles even when times get tough, or are principles, supporting polices and practices an optional extra? The top supermarkets appear to be holding firm at this time and so it would seem that there can be no excuse for not getting and then holding on to these principles.

The ETI Food, Farming and Fisheries team has seen a wealth of member activity directed at additional support for suppliers and their workers in the food sector in particular. This should be expected, but it is reassuring to see this also demonstrated in practice. Not to say that some suppliers – such as cut flowers and some prepared fresh produce – have not suffered. But we have seen intense activity to communicate with suppliers, understand their challenges and to provide at the very least advice and guidance and in some cases material benefits, to help get through this.

Behind the Barcodes doesn't rank every UK supermarket. Some ETI members who don't appear here (such as M&S, Waitrose, and Coop) might also rank favourably if their work in these key areas was measured. ETI is developing its own public report on member performance, which we expect to enhance Oxfam's scrutiny and help us to more fully track progress and hold retailers to account.  

But why do we not see more supermarkets’ clustering around the Tesco and Sainsburys level – given it is clearly achievable? Do others’ business models make such policy guarantees to suppliers and their workers harder? Do investors threaten action if companies appear to soften towards business partners and their employees? Do customers boycott stores if (marginally higher) prices reflect the costs of fair treatment for suppliers and their workers? Certainly, ETI does not encourage policies on their own and these must absolutely be translated into meaningful actions on the ground.

A final reflection on smallholders and workers. In a week when we have heard that Nestle is abandoning their commitment to Fairtrade smallholders, it is interesting to see that while there is some improvement at the top of these tables, there is still a terrible lack of respect and support shown for smallholders and workers in the lower half.

How hard can this be? Do profits collapse if farmers are guaranteed a fair price for their crop and if workers are allowed to earn a living wage (that pays for a home, schooling for the kids, medical care, food and a life beyond the workplace)?

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Blog RSS

Related content

  • Common Framework for Responsible Purchasing Practices in Food
  • Developing a pool of master trainers
  • Covid-19 prevention behaviour change communication materials
  • Raising awareness of Covid-19 prevention among workers
  • Access to information for RMG workers in Bangladesh: a gender perspective
  • Business continuity guide

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on ethical trade.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127