Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful Stakeholder Engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equality in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
    • Annual impact report
  • About ETI
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. blog

ETI signs Seafood Working Group (SWG) statement to highlight weaknesses in the (FISH) Standard for Crew 

  • Sally Hodgkinson
  • 29 April 2021

The Seafood Working Group – a global coalition of human rights, labor and environmental organizations working to end forced labor in the global seafood industry – has put out a critical statement detailing ways in which the Fairness, Integrity, Safety and Health (FISH) Standard for Crew certification does not offer a ‘legitimate or effective mechanism for the identification of labor abuse on fishing vessels in seafood supply chains.’  

The SWG statement identifies nine areas where the current certification fails to adequately address or credibly safeguard the very workers that it is intended to protect; not least in that there is no meaningful role for workers or their representatives in the development, monitoring and enforcement of the certification. 

ETI’s Nick Kightley explains that the current business model for the seafood industry, which has been put in place by companies, by international bodies and by States, is built on elective action by responsibly-minded businesses. It takes too few steps to put genuine pressure on industry players who are not ‘willing’ to uphold set standards and adhere to good practice that protects workers’ rights and environmental sustainability. 

We don’t want to see this fresh initiative trip up at the first hurdle by failing to include workers and their representatives (and companies and their representative bodies) in the core, constructive dialogue.

Nick Kightley, ETI Strategic Lead - Food and Farming

ETI welcomes the opportunity for a wider debate about how best to bring improvements for workers and to ensure the sustainability of the seafood industry as a whole. As Nick explains, ‘This is not about singling out a particular standard for criticism above all others; however, we’d like to see a clear invitation to discuss the matters raised.’

Stay up to date

Stay up to date with the latest from ETI via the following channels:
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Blog RSS

Related content

  • ETI statement: Workers' rights in UK fisheries
  • Call to action on seafarers during COVID-19
  • Seafarers and movement of goods, COVID-19 briefing
  • ETI statement on IMO protocols for seafarers during COVID-19
  • Thai Seafood Working Group Letter to Obama
  • Protecting vulnerable fishers and seafood workers from COVID-19

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on ethical trade.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127