Skip to main content
Home

Main menu

  • Home
  • Why ETI
    • Why join ETI
  • ETI Base Code
    • Base Code overview
    • Base Code clause 1: Employment is freely chosen
    • Base Code clause 2: Freedom of association
    • Base Code clause 3: Working conditions are safe and hygienic
    • Base Code clause 4: Child labour shall not be used
    • Base Code clause 5: Living wages are paid
    • Base Code clause 6: Working hours are not excessive
    • Base Code clause 7: No discrimination is practiced
    • Base Code clause 8: Regular employment is provided
    • Base Code clause 9: No harsh or inhumane treatment is allowed
  • Our approach
    • Membership
    • Programmes
    • Transparency
    • Meaningful stakeholder engagement (MSE)
  • Our expertise
    • Climate change & Just transitions
    • Crisis response
    • Gender equality in supply chains
    • Worker representation
    • Forced labour & modern slavery
    • Responsible purchasing practices
      • RPP in manufacturing
    • Human rights due diligence
      • HRDD legislation tracker
  • Resources
    • Guidance & reports
    • Blog
    • Case studies
    • Training
    • Events
      • ETI Insights series
    • Annual impact report
  • About ETI
    • Who we are
      • ETI's origins
    • What we do
    • Our members
      • Public reporting performance
    • Global presence
    • Governance
    • Our team
      • ETI Board members

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. guidance and reports
  3. responsible purchasing practices rpp resource hub
  • Getting started
  • Principle 1: integration
  • Principle 2: Equal Partnership
  • Principle 3: Collaborative Production Planning
  • Principle 4: Fair Payment & Contract Terms
    • Build fair and inclusive contracting processes
    • Ensure your payment processes enable financial resilience and timely wages
    • Use penalties sparingly and responsibly
  • Principle 5: Sustainable Costing
  • Continuous progress

Ensure your payment processes enable financial resilience and timely wages

Contents

Fair and reliable payment terms help suppliers maintain healthy cash flow, pay workers on time, and invest in better working conditions. When payment terms are too long or payments are delayed, it can create real challenges for suppliers and for the people working in your supply chain.

Suppliers have financial obligations to pay their workers, suppliers and overheads. Long payment terms or late payments can put significant pressure on cash flow, potentially leading to late payment of wages, reputational damage with providers, or high interest rates with lenders. These impacts can erode financial viability, worker wages and investment in improved environmental performance and working conditions. 

Offering shorter payment terms is a practical way to help suppliers strengthen their cash flow and invest in better working conditions. Some companies offer partial payments upfront, to help cover fabric costs when these are needed. Flexible or shorter terms are especially recommended for smaller suppliers or those facing financial challenges.

In this video: Jerry, a factory manager in China

Jerry talks about the challenges manufacturers face when payment terms are too long. He highlights: 

  • 30-to-60-day payment terms (which are short compared to much of the industry) place significant financial pressure on to suppliers who need to pay workers (and their own suppliers).
  • As a manufacturer, they are regularly faced with not being able to pay workers on time, because of long payment terms or delayed payments.
  • One of their good customers pays 20% deposit and pays the rest within 2-3 days after the goods are shipped.
  • This helps the manufacturer to feel respected and treated as a partner.

Track and improve payment times

Late payment for goods is a common challenge for suppliers—one that many buyers may not even be aware of. Putting systems in place to track and improve payment times is good practice and a meaningful way to measure and strengthen your company’s responsible purchasing performance.

Consider responsible financing options

Whilst third party financing options should never be used to replace responsible practice—including timely payments, reasonable payment terms and sustainable costing—it’s important to acknowledge that some suppliers may need additional financing support. Often this need is met by unethical providers at high risk and cost to the supplier. 

Many purchasing companies are in a strong position to support their suppliers to access more responsible and safe financing. This may be a viable way to help suppliers financially, in parallel with improving purchasing practices. 

  • Previous
  • Up
  • Next

Get the latest

Subscribe to our email newsletters and stay up to speed on ethical trade.
Subscribe

ETI elsewhere

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Footer

  • ETI Community
  • Accessibility
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Jobs at ETI
  • Press resources
  • Security & privacy
Other ETIs: Bangladesh, Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Ethical Trading Initiative | Registered No. 3578127